Jaffa, Kree!
Moderator
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2928 |
this is a really fascinating conversation. (my reply will be rather disjointed, i'm sure- appologies in advance)
I agree with both sides of this 'technological advancement' debate.. I think there would be a limit on how far we could have advanced in 5 years, and that there would be, for example, componants of the ion cannon that we cannot yet duplicate,but that doesn't mean they cant learn anything from studying these blueprints. maybe adapt the firing mechanism to work with energies/elements or projectiles we alreay have at our disposal? Not just look at the whole thing and say 'we cant do that yet' and then throw it all in the waste bin!
This applies to other technology too, especially the Goa'uld techs. They are quite simple and obvious compared to other more advanceds techs.. Their composition and power source may be different to what we know - but we've already harnessed the power of naguadah (one for the other side - a 'technology' we have made progress with), and are able to break at least some of the technology down to it's more basic elements - we should be able to reproduce it with little effort. If not reproduce, than at least use it for our advantage. Smaller things like weapons (zats, staff weapons), hand (and hand held) devices we can use without problems (especially with Carter and her ex-symbiote-super-powers ).
Dont forget, we did attempt to move forward technologically with the adaption and modification of the Glider - which backfired spectacularily, but it was still an attempt that should be applauded, and not discourage us to try again with something else. The Tok'ra, in particular Jacob, are holding back on helping us truely prepare for the impending invasion (btw, i really liked that 'fort' analogy).
The whole point of telling the rest of earth that the stargate exists, and all the information that surrounds that (the existance of the Goa'uld, and other aliens on earth, the alliance etc etc) is a passion for me - I am TOTALLY for it being made public, and even if you keep with in the context of this being a sci-fi show, i think there are some remarkable plot and story-arc possibilities surrounding this idea. It's frustrating watching the show and knowing that they are limiting it's possibilities by a) turning it polictical b) not advancing to any level that is believable (both as explained above, and because it's just not plausable anymore for SG-1 to keep on winning), and c) keeping the whole Stargate program a secret.
**
In regards to those dissapointed by what MS said about his reasons for leaving the show - yes, it may come across as selfish and shallow, but that is not the case at all. There are many many reaons that combined for him to make this decision, and there is no way for us to know all of them. How do you know he *didn't* go to the writes, producers, the PTB etc etc and rally for Daniel to take a different direction, to grow, to have the focus work in his favour, or at least, have him more included in the myth-arcs of the show...? Maybe it was TPTB that didn't think Daniel was a viable enough character to keep him included in the show, hmm..?
His contract was up. He didn't have to renew it. Most actors like to make changes in order for them to sign up again so that they fully benifit from having to do another year of long hours, hard work, etc etc - if they aren't going to gain any satisfaction from it, then why should they have to endure it when they aren't obliged to, or if they aren't going to be happy doing it? Why ruin a year of your life when you have other options open to you? This doesn't mean he's washed his hands of the show, or that he wont regret his decision - but it was his decision, and he'll have to live with that - we only have to live without a much loved character on our TV sets once a week. Just be happy the show is still around, at least for a little while longer.
As someone mentioned above - would you rather he go out with a bang, or just put in a half-arsed effort and for him to be unhappy for a year? If you do, then that is rather selfish of you.
__________________
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
Report this post to a moderator | ? + *
|